Critique of Natron Theory Proponent's Scientific Credibility. The natron theory proposes using natron for etching stones, breaking stones, making water glass, and geopolymers Speaker argues Marcel caters to scientifically illiterate audiences or those who don't care about being lied to Marcel exaggerates natron prevalence to claim ancients had unlimited access
A prominent natron theory proponent exaggerates natron prevalence to claim unlimited ancient access. Problem: the theory's proponents withhold chemicals as 'special ingredients' and the geopolymeric hypothesis for the Great Pyramid's casing stones has been disproven by detailed petrographic examinations. Valid theories deserve rigorous testing.
Key Facts
- The natron theory proposes using natron for etching stones, breaking stones, making water glass, and geopolymers
- Speaker argues Marcel caters to scientifically illiterate audiences or those who don't care about being lied to
- Marcel exaggerates natron prevalence to claim ancients had unlimited access
- Speaker cannot trust Marcel's experiments because he withholds chemicals as 'special ingredients'
- Marcel has not retracted demonstrable errors, damaging his credibility
- The geopolymer theory itself may be valid, but Marcel's misinformation harms the entire field
Source: I Love Geopolymers, But The Natron Theory Has a Problem by DeDunking