Controversy over ancient precision vases and Matt Bell's private collection. Max Fulmichek published a paper arguing that the precise vases in Matt Bell's collection are not ancient because the Cairo Museum has no comparable examples. Ben Van Kirkwick previously suggested the vases were the product of ancient high technology. Flint Dibble claimed professional ethics rules prevent him from assessing private collections.
Max Fomitchev-Zamilov argues the precision vases in Matt Beall's private collection can't be ancient because the Cairo Museum holds nothing comparable. Ben van Kerkwyk previously attributed them to lost ancient technology. One researcher cited professional ethics as barring him from evaluating private collections, while others suggest a primitive lathe could have produced them.
Key Facts
- Max Fulmichek published a paper arguing that the precise vases in Matt Bell's collection are not ancient because the Cairo Museum has no comparable examples.
- Ben Van Kirkwick previously suggested the vases were the product of ancient high technology.
- Flint Dibble claimed professional ethics rules prevent him from assessing private collections.
- The host argued the vases may have been made on a primitive lathe, not modern machinery.
Source: Teaching Flint Dibble & Neal Sendlak Logic & Facts LIVE P1 1 by DeDunking